Showing posts with label Davis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Davis. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Art and Nature: New York Water Front by Stuart Davis (1938) (3 of 3)


 Notes and Sources for this Essay on Stuart Davis
--------
Note 1:  For actual pictures of the NY tug boats and lighthouse, this site offers a few: “New York Tugboats and the Little Red Lighthouse” at Inkwatu. http://inkwatu.com/2008/09/10/new-york-tugboats-and-the-little-red-lighthouse/

Works Used

Arnold, Michael, “Stuart Davis, American Painter, 1894-1964” Simply Art, 2011, http://www.michaelarnoldart.com/Stuart%20Davis.htm,

Bartel, Martin, “An Art Teacher’s Guide to Critique Art Work”, Goshen College, 2008, http://www.goshen.edu/art/ed/critique1.html,

Blizzard, Gladys, “Come Look With Me:  Exploring Landscape Art With Children”, Charlesbridge: Watertown MA, 2006

Boddy-Evans Marion, “All About Painting”, About.com, http://painting.about.com/,

Brucato, Bruce Capt, “NY Tugmaster’s Weblog”, 2012, http://captbbrucato.wordpress.com/,

Essak, Shelley, “All About Art History”, About.com, http://arthistory.about.com/,

Jones, Hilton, “New York Tugboats and the Little Red Lighthouse”, INKWATU: Delights Near and Far, 10 September 2008 http://inkwatu.com/2008/09/10/new-york-tugboats-and-the-little-red-lighthouse/,

----, “Notes on Stuart Davis”, Abstract Expressionism, Warholstars.org, 2006, http://www.warholstars.org/abstractexpressionism/artists/davis/stuartdavis.html,

Peltakian, Danielle, “Stuart Davis”, Sullivan Goss: An American Gallery, 2011, http://www.sullivangoss.com/Stuart_Davis/,

----, “Understanding Formal Analysis”, J. Paul Getty Museum, 2012, http://www.getty.edu/education/teachers/building_lessons/formal_analysis.html,

Monday, February 13, 2012

Art and Nature: New York Water Front by Stuart Davis (1938) (2 of 3)

  The above link will open to the Painting.

However, there is order amid the chaos.  Balance is achieved with the horizontal sign dividing the painting into thirds.  The vertical red-orange main-mast and yellow-orange mast keep the thirds intact.  The left side has the yellow-orange smoke and the right side has the lavender bridge.  The eye is first attracted to the sign, then to the smoke bellowing out, and then finally slides down the guide wire.  Afterwards, the eye circles around to the bridge back to the sign again.  Balance is this circle, which is both constantly dynamic and in perfect harmony.

Repetition in the painting is the squares and rectangles that puncture this circle.  The squares keep rhythm, syncopating with the vertical and horizontal hash marks, that gives depth to the buildings and tug.  These same shapes are repeated to allow the observer to enjoy the scene without being overwhelmed.

Davis’ signature style is to infuse a painting with a jazz rhythm and variety.  The artist himself said that he often painted while listening to jazz music, and that his paintings reflect this in their rhythms.  However, an actual waterfront does lends itself to a staccato beat, with ships are being towed in and out; cargo is being loaded and unloaded.  The rhythm of “New York Waterfront” is supported by the bass beat of the blacks and greys.  The mellow tones of the alto saxophone are the muted reds and oranges.  The trumpet riffs are the bright yellows and whites.  Each element of the painting moves together in the improvisations and broken rhythms of jazz.  The bass beat keeps the painting moving, while the muted colors keep the melody easy and smooth.

In an interview with John Wingate for “Night Beat” in 1956, Davis said, “Well, my attitude toward life is realistic, but realism doesn’t include merely what one immediately sees with the eye at a given moment – one also relates it to past experience…One relates it to feelings, ideas.  And what is real about the experience is the totality of the awareness of it.”  What Davis offers us is not a painting of a waterfront but our encounter with one.  We experience the essence of the waterfront, which ties us to everyone else who have experienced it as well.  The New York waterfront ceases to be a real place, and becomes a part of our being.  

In his painting, Davis gives us hints as to the reality that is the New York waterfront.  First, he paints the tug with the traditional dull red of the New York tugs. Besides the color, the tug has a tall, narrow house, which reaches to the sign.  Since New York tugs used a version of a steam engine, the steam smoke coming out of the smokestack was a common site.  (Other waterfronts used coal, at the time Davis painted his picture.)  Adding to the scene is the Little Red Lighthouse and the George Washington Bridge both which are at the Hudson River.  (The lavender square represents the suspension bridge, while the square red pentagon is the lighthouse.)  With this special knowledge of New York City, we can apply what we know to a scene of jumbled shapes and wild colors to see beyond to what is actually there.  This is augury in art – looking with the inner eye, applying our special knowledge, and divining what is before us.

Like Davis, we can see with our second eye, and relate the painting to the past, present, and future.  Descending into the bones of the painting, we see the tug which is captured in the moment.  What will come next?  Where is the ship going?  Does it matter?  We stick our toe in the stream of time at the nexus of this moment, before things shift and become revealed.  The future for us like the waterfront is fluid, constantly changing.

We go deeper into the core of why a painting of a tug, a lighthouse, a bridge and several buildings.  The tug speaks to the commonality of our daily experiences.  As the workhorses of the harbor, the small tugs take the large tankers safely to the docks and back out.  The lighthouse next to the bridge offers more safety to all who venture forth.  Beyond the lighthouse and bridge are the beckoning windows of warmth and security.  We have arrived to where we need to be – the future.  Like the tug captain, we read the waters, watch for signs of trouble, and practice our art.  We venture forth from the past of the lighthouse into the future of the distant buildings, while being safely guided by our bridge of the present.

Sunday, February 12, 2012

Art and Nature: New York Water Front by Stuart Davis (1938) (1 of 3)


Stuart Davis “New York Waterfront” 1938, Gouache on paper

Noted abstract expressionist, Stuart Davis (American, 1894-1964) described his art as stripping an object down to its core, and then painting it as he perceived it.  Davis’ paintings were not factual depictions of a place but its essence.  He stated, “I can work from Nature…In each case, the process consists of transposition of the forms of the subject into a coherent structure.”  Like a diviner, Davis used his inner eye to see beyond the reality before him.

At first “New York Waterfront” seems to be a jumble of odd shapes, strange colors, and alien lines.  However there is an interior logic to this painting.  A visit to a waterfront does seem disjointed, since the activity there is both static and chaotic.  Ships are being towed into wharfs, while others wait to be unloaded.  Small tugs and large tankers are interspersed between warehouses, docks, offices, and factories.  In New York City, the city’s skyscrapers are often seen in the distance.  Looking at the painting again with their second eye, the observer senses the disordered stillness of a place covered with mundane grit and grime.

New York Waterfront” encourages the observer to see beyond what is there.  Penetrate the jumble and disorganized groups of shapes and lines with the inner eye, and a tug which is billowing smoke emerges.  Focusing on the ship gliding by, the observer begins to see the buildings in the background – the lighthouse, warehouse, skyscraper, as well as the bridge.

Using the elements and principles of art, the observer can discern how Davis accomplished all this with his painting.  Breaking the painting down to its basic elements, and then building it back up through the principles of art, the observer can divine the waterfront as Davis intended.  Since he leaves clues as to the place in the painting, we engage in “augury by art” to find out where.  Furthermore by peering more intently, we can discern more profound meanings in this simple scene.

As an artist, Davis was more interested in form and color than in realistic composition.  In this painting, the vertical lines dominate the background while horizontal ones dominate the foreground.  Two curved lines (guide wires on the tug) sweep down from the ship’s smokestack to its deck.  These curved lines connect the foreground with the background, by directing the eye to look further back.  Meanwhile the vertical and horizontal lines give backbone to the painting, and hold it together.

Emphasizing the man-made qualities of the scene are the rectangles and squares.  Softening their sharp corners are the circles of the tug’s funnels.  Furthermore, Davis adds a natural element to the scene with the shape of the smoke coming out of the tugboat’s smokestack.  Meanwhile, the angular shapes of the tug contrast subtly with the straight ones of the buildings.  Another element softening the verticality of the scene is the horizontal rectangles.  The sign with the curved letters and the rounded shapes add more interest to the painting.

Negative space surrounds the scene, calming the uncontrollable shapes and colors.  Also, this negative space gives a perspective to the painting by allowing the buildings to recede into the background.  The ship is brought to the foreground with the black and white spaces.  Also the empty space alludes to the city beyond in the haze of the off-white color.

The most striking aspect of “New York Waterfront” is Davis’ use of colors.  At first glance, the colors of the painting seem bright and gay.  The cheerful yellows, oranges, reds, and lavenders make the scene throb with energy, conveying the activity of the place.  However, the pure black and white colors, which offset these warm colors, highlight their muted quality.  Then the observer notices that the blue-greys of the tug are actually the brighter colors.  These greys allow the ship to be noticed in the foreground.  The more muted oranges and reds convey the grittiness and drabness of the place.  Overall, the energetic palate of the reds is muted to calm the frenetic activity. 

Friday, October 21, 2011

Art and Nature: Art for Art's Sake (2 of 2)


These two artists changed my thinking about the purpose of art.  The artist statement by Jose Clemente Orozco (Mexican 1883-1949) concerning his mural “The Epic of American Civilization” (1932-1934) further cemented my new perceptions. He said (his capitals) “IN every painting, as in any other work of art, there is always an IDEA, never a STORY. The idea is the point of departure, the first cause of the plastic construction, and it is present all the time as energy creating matter. The stories and other literary associations exist only in the mind of the spectator, the painting acting as the stimulus.” 

The value of the art lies therefore within the viewer.  For example viewing paintings by Stuart Davis (American, 1894-1964) is an experience in lyricism.  Davis explored how painting was like music through colors, shape, and words.  Each painting reflects the pulse of a place, rather than the place itself.  A forefather of the Pop Art Movement, Davis translated squiggly lines and flashing colors into striking visual images.

Another example music explored as painting is “Jazz” (1947) by Henri Matisse (French, 1869-1954).  With his painted cutouts and bright colors, Matisse created the visual aspect of jazz.  His designs experimented with rhythm and repetition that was broken by improvisation much like jazz music.

In contrast, the Neoclassism Movement (1760-1850) regarded art to be a medium to uplift and enlighten the spectator.  Subjects from ancient Greece and Rome were plumbed for their ability to morally educate people.  The purpose of art was therefore to promote ethical behavior for all classes.  Hence, “The Stone Breakers” (Gustave Courbet, 1849) or “The Man with the HoeL’homme a la loue” (Jean-Francois Millet, 1860-1862) was scandalous.  Menial labor was not a worthy topic for art.  

What is considered art changes in various eras.  Menial labor instead of abstract art can be a vehicle to contemplate life.  From my experiences in studying art, I learnt that art for art’s sake encompasses a wide variety of art.  It is up to the viewer to decide how to regard it.  Art simply is.  It has no other purpose than to simply be.  In his principles of aesthetics, Immanuel Kant (German, 1724- 1804) stressed that the object of art should exist only for itself.  Art becomes a vehicle for the observer to engage with it.

I now agree with Oscar Wilde (Irish, 1854-1900) on beauty and art.  He said, “Aestheticism is a search after the signs of the beautiful.  It is the science of the beautiful through which men seek the correlation of the arts.  It is to speak more exactly the search after the secret of life.”  Art for art’s sake prompts us to seek beauty.  We contemplate the art and discover life.  We can look at Pollock’s drip paintings or “The Stone Breakers” as a window on life beyond our senses.

Works Used

Arnold, Michael, “Stuart Davis, American Painter, 1894-1964” Simply Art, 2011, http://www.michaelarnoldart.com/Stuart%20Davis.htm,

Coyle, Laurie and Rick Tejada-Flores, “OROZCO: Man of Fire”, Paradigm Productions, 2007, http://www.paradigmproductions.org/films/orozco/?c=synopsis, 

Dabrowski, Magdalena, “Henri Matisse (1869–1954)”, Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History, New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, October 2004, http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/mati/hd_mati.htm,

Essak, Shelley, “All About Art History”, About.com, http://arthistory.about.com/,

---, “Guide to Art History”, ArtHistory.net, 2009, http://www.arthistory.net/,

Janson, H.W. and Dora Jane Janson, “The Story of Painting”, Harry N Abrams: New York, 1966.

Horsley, Carter, “Mumbo Jumbo and Mud Pies: Jackson Pollock”, The City Review, 1999, http://www.thecityreview.com/pollock.html,

---, “Matisse: Life and Painting”, Henri Matisse.net, 2011, http://www.henri-matisse.net/index.html,

---, “Orozco – An Epic of American Civilization”, Dartmouth College, http://www.dartmouth.edu/~library/Orozco/epic.html,

Slater, Barry, “Aesthetics”, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, July 2005, http://www.iep.utm.edu/aestheti/,

---, “Willem de Kooning”, The Art Story: Modern Art Movement, 2011, http://www.theartstory.org/artist-de-kooning-willem.htm,