The
founding myth of the City of Rome centers on the twin brothers, Romulus and
Remus. This myth encompasses the circumstances of their birth, their coming of
age, and the death of Remus by his brother. What makes this myth remarkable,
for me, is that this is essentially the creation myth for ancient Romans. The
myths of Romans usually focused on civic ethics or piety toward the Gods. (Any
myth that detailed the creation of the world was usually adapted from the
Greeks.) This founding myth presents the belief of the Romans that they were
called to a greater destiny in the world. However, they were unsparing in highlighting
that Romulus murdered his brother or that the original Romans were criminals.
The
elements of this myth are twins with a divine parentage: in their case, Mars,
the God of War. Their royal grandfather is overthrown, and their mother is made
a Vestal Virgin. The twins are sent out to be killed by their great uncle, but
are saved through magical intervention. A wolf rescues them and nurses them
until they are found. A childless couple, Faustulus and his wife adopts the
twins and raise them as shepherds. When the brothers are grown, they get into
trouble with the king’s men. When they were taken before their great uncle, who
happens to be the king, Romulus kills him, and reinstates their grandfather and
frees their mother. Afterwards, the brothers leave to find their own fortune. Along
the way, they argue over where to establish their new city. Goaded into fury by
Remus, Romulus kills his brother. Filled with remorse, he buries Remus with
great pomp, and then founds The City of Rome.
Because
of my brain injury, writing fiction is difficult. Imagining characters and constructing
a plot is hard. However, I can read fiction, and my favorite genre is crime
noir. I decided to rewrite the myth of Romulus and Remus in that form.
Comparing this Roman myth to pulp fiction, it sounds like something from the
stories of American organized crime. Keeping the original Roman names, I
rewrote the myth as crime noir.
In
the City of Alba Longa, the Numitor Crime Family ruled the criminal underworld.
The head of the Family, Don Numitor was so powerful that he had a seat on the
National Commission, which ruled the criminal underworld of the nation. The
head of the Commission (the Boss of Bosses) was Don Maroni (Mars, the God of
War). In addition, Don Maroni was interested in Rhea Silvia, Don Numitor’s daughter.
Meanwhile,
Amulius seized control of the Family from his unsuspecting brother. After his
coup,
Amulius confined Numitor to his home, and forced his niece into a
convent. To ensure that Rhea Silvia remained at the convent, Don Amulius bribed
the Mother Superior.
After
Don Maroni found out where Rhea Silvia was, he
also bribed the Mother Superior to ensure that his visits were unimpeded. In a few months, Rhea Silva became
pregnant. Therefore the Mother Superior asked Don Amulius to come and fetch his
niece. After he arrives, she informs him that the father of his niece’s
children is none other than Don Maroni. Not willing to offend the Boss of
Bosses, Don Amulius imprisons her with her father in their house.
However,
Don Amulius regarded her children to be a different matter. He would tell Don
Maroni, that the two boys died at birth. Meanwhile, he ordered one of his men
to “take care” of them. The goon dumped the twins into the Tiber River. They
floated downstream until a stray dog paddled out and pulled them to land. Since
she had lost her puppies, the mangy dog nursed the boys as her own. Then, a
passing farmer heard their cries, rescued them, and took the babies to his
farm. Faustulus and his wife, Acca Larentia, raised Romulus and Remus as their own
sons.
Like
many young men, Romulus and Remus longed to leave the farm and go into the
city. During a trip to Alba Longa, Romulus and Remus got into trouble. Don
Amulius’ men dragged them to the “Padrino,”
Don Amulius, since Remus had killed their Capo (Crew Boss). However, Romulus
escaped, and formed a gang of toughs to storm Don Amulius’ office to rescue his
brother. In the melee that followed, he killed Don Amulius.
The
Underboss of the Amulius Family recognized the two brothers as the children of
Rhea Silva and Don Maroni. Because of this, he offered them the position of Don
of the Family. But, Romulus decided that his grandfather be reinstated instead,
and their mother freed. After reuniting with their mother, and learning who
their father was, Romulus and Remus set out to start their own crime family, in
another city.
Empowered
by being the sons of Don Maroni, the two brothers gathered an impressive group
of criminals. As they searched for a suitable city, Romulus and Remus fought
with each other. Arriving at a likely town, their arguing became more intense about
who would be boss of the new crime family. After Romulus claimed that he received
a sign from their father, he decided that this small town is the place to start
their Family. Moreover, he announced that he would be the Don. Chagrined at
being ignored by his brother, Remus taunted him for being so stupid to set up “business”
in such a small town. Enraged, Romulus killed him. After ruing the murder of
his brother, Romulus gave Remus a magnificent funeral. Then, he became Don
Romulus, the head of the Rome Family, his new crime organization.
Works used.
Garcia,
Brittany, “Romulus and Remus.”
Ancient History Encyclopedia. 4 October 2013. Web. http://www.ancient.eu/Romulus_and_Remus/.
“Roman
Mythology,” Myths Encyclopedia. 2015. Web. http://www.mythencyclopedia.com/Pr-Sa/Roman-Mythology.html.
“Roman
Mythology,” United Nations of Roma Victrix History. 2015. Web. http://www.unrv.com/culture/mythology.php.
Watson,
Donald, “Roman Mythology.” Ancient
History Encyclopedia. 10 December 2014. Web. http://www.ancient.eu/Roman_Mythology/.
This is a blog about nature in all her glory. The folklore and general ideas about what messages nature bring to people.
Showing posts with label gangsters. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gangsters. Show all posts
Saturday, May 02, 2015
Friday, February 27, 2015
Babylonian Creation Myth retold for Modern Times: The Mobsters (1991) (part 2 of 2)
![]() |
| Meyer Lansky (Patrick Dempsey) |
Watching
Faranzano divide the underworld of New York City into the Five Families,
Luciano sees how he can organize the other mobsters effectively into a collective
group. After Faranzano declares himself “Boss of Bosses” (Capo di tutti capi), Luciano decides that the wars over who is to
be the next boss has to end. Faranzano knows this and sends Mad Dog Coll
(Irish) to murder him, only to have Luciano kill him instead.
After
confronting Faranzano, Luciano drops him to the pavement below, killing him. The
scene of Luciano holding Faranzano’s body outside a window of a tall building is
reminiscent of Marduk using the two halves of Tiamat’s body to form the heavens
and the earth. In this scene, Luciano acts as Marduk in recreating his world.
The
final scene has Luciano meeting with the crime bosses from all over the United
States. He explains that the underworld will be run nationally by a commission
of bosses. The head of the new Commission would be selected by the bosses. Of
course, they choose Luciano, who, like Marduk, establishes a new order with
himself as the boss.
Though
two seemingly dissimilar stories, “Mobsters”
and the Babylonian Creation Epic echo each other. Although Luciano and the
formation of the National Commission are history, the movie reimagines their
story in mythic terms. The result is the retelling of the "Enuma Ellish" for modern audiences.
Works Used.
“Ancient
Mesopotamian Gods and Goddesses.” U.K. Higher Education Project. 2011. Web. http://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/amgg/index.html .
Capeci,
Jerry, “The Complete Idiot’s Guide to the
Mafia, 2nd edition.” Alpha:
New York. 2004. Print.
Cawthorne, Nigel, “Mafia: The History of the Mob.” Arcturus: London. 2012. Print.
Cicero,
Sandra, “A Guide to the Babylonian Tarot.”
Llewellyn: Woodbury, MN, 2006. Print.
Cipollini, Christian, “Lucky Luciano: Mysterious Tales of a
Gangland Legend.” Strategic Media: Rock Hill, SC. 2014. Print.
“Mobsters.”
Kabankoff, Michael, Dr. Perf. Christian Slater, Patrick Dempsey, Richard
Grieco, Costas Mandylor. Universal Studios. 1991 Movie. DVD..
Siren,
Christopher, “The Assyro-Babylonian Mythology FAQ.” 2003. Web. http://home.comcast.net/~chris.s/assyrbabyl-faq.html .
“Sumerian
Mythology FAQ.” 2000. Web. http://home.comcast.net/~chris.s/sumer-faq.html.
Smitha,
Frank, “Civilization in Mesopotamia.” Macrohistory
and World Time Line. 2014. Web. http://www.fsmitha.com/h1/ch01.htm .
Thursday, February 26, 2015
Babylonian Creation Myth retold for Modern Times: The Mobsters (1991) (part 1 of 2)
![]() |
| Rothstein (F. Murray Abraham) and Luciano (Christian Slater) |
In
the Babylonian Creation Myth (Enuma
Ellish), the world is first created by the two original Gods – Apsu of the
Sweet Water and Tiamat of the Salt Water. These Gods mingled their waters and gave
birth to the next generation of Gods. Chaffing under the rule of Apsu and
Tiamat, these “New” Gods decide kill Them. After the murder of Apsu, her mate, Tiamat
wages war against Them. In desperation, the leaders of the “New” Gods, Anu,
Enlil, and Enki seek out Marduk, the principal God of the Babylonians for his
help. He, only, agrees to fight Tiamat, if They will make Him their ruler. Then
after defeating Tiamat, Marduk remakes the world from her body, and assumes
leadership over all the Gods.
The
Babylonians recited this myth every New Year, reminding themselves of their
place in the universe. The subtext of the creation myth is that other peoples (including
the Sumerians) ruled Mesopotamia before the coming of the Babylonians. After
constant warfare by the others, the Babylonians came to establish law and order
in the region. Mesopotamia was then recreated into a Babylonian construct.
The
movie, “Mobsters” (Michael Kabankoff,
1991), tells a similar story. Obviously, it is about the rise of Charles
(Lucky) Luciano from a poor Sicilian immigrant to the boss of the new National
Commission of the American mob. Although the film purports to depict an
historical person and his deeds, the director and writer instead chose to only highlight
certain elements of his life, and omit others. Moreover, they also added
fictional elements to highlight their plot points. The result was a mythic
retelling of Luciano as Marduk.
At
first glance, the pairing of the activities of American mobsters in the 1920s
to the Creation Epic of the Babylonians seems absurd. However, there are subtle
similarities such as two original bosses ruling the criminal underworld of New
York City. Furthermore, the subtext of both are the same – the overthrow of the
old order, a period of disarray, and finally the establishment of the new
order. The original world that Luciano inhabits is ruled by two Sicilian bosses
– Joe Masseria and Salavatore Faranzano. Like Tiamat and Apsu, these two bosses
spawn other bosses, who chafe under their rule. Fearing usurpation, Masseria
and Faranzano kill off the others first. The war between the two finally ends
when Luciano kills them both, and recreates the Mob as his own construct.
In
both stories, ethnicity is stressed since new groups of peoples are moving in to
replace the original groups. This is implied in the Babylonian epic with the
Gods of the Sumerians becoming ruled by the Gods of the Babylonians. In
Luciano’s world, Arnold Rothstein, who is Jewish, is the middle generation of
bosses. Like Anu, Rothstein takes the next generation under his wing. He grooms
the mixed ethnic group of Luciano, Frank Costello (Sicilian), Meyer Lansky
(Russian Jew), and Bugsy Siegel (Ukrainian Jew) to be the future bosses.
Tuesday, January 06, 2015
Examining the Nexus of History and Legend
The major area within Lore that
fascinates me is the nexus between history and legend. What makes certain
historical people legends? Why do some people and their exploits become mythic,
and not others? How did these particular historical figures embed themselves
into the public imagination?
I became first aware of this phenomena with Davy Crockett. I had learned that he was probably taken prisoner of war after the Battle of the Alamo (1836), and later killed. Both the Alamo and Crockett loom large in people’s imaginations for different reasons. The Battle of the Alamo became a powerful story of martyrdom for Texas independence. Meanwhile Crocket was famous for his tales of his frontier exploits. Since the Disney series of the 1950s featured him dying during the battle, various people have objected to the notion of Crockett being a prisoner. However, there is confusion about where and when he died. Perhaps because of this murkiness, people refer that Crockett died a heroic death. His dying at the Alamo would number him amongst the Texan martyrs.
Then there is the story of how Eliot Ness brought Al Capone (Alphonse Capone) to justice. Because of “The Untouchables,” the memoir of Ness during his days as a U.S. Treasury Agent in Chicago, and later the TV program that featured his exploits, people believed that he had put the notorious gangster Capone in prison. However, it was the IRA agent Frank Wilson, and his special task force who brought the charges of income tax evasion against Capone in 1931. Few people realize that Capone was convicted for not paying his federal income taxes, and not for his other heinous crimes.
Did this epic story come from Ness igniting the public imagination with his colorful memoir? His writing makes for a compelling story of good overcoming evil. Since Capone seemed to be such a monster, and Ness so incorruptible and heroic, the two men became yoked together in a Christian morality play of good versus evil. Becoming larger than life, Ness and Capone morphed into equal and opposing forces locked in a titanic struggle.
Is there a nexus between notoriety and mystery that propels someone to be a legend? Consider the continual popularity of the infamous mobster, Lucky Luciano (Salvatore Lucania (1897-1962)). What makes him memorable while his contemporaries are relatively forgotten? Although Frank Costello (Francesco Castiglia), a friend of Luciano, became known as the “Prime Minister of the Mob,” few outside of crime history have heard of him. Meanwhile, popular culture made Luciano “Public Enemy Number One.” Stories about his scars, attempted murder, and gangster life abound. Often, these tales have been embellished around a small grain of truth. Many people viewed Luciano as the successful antihero, who thwarted authority. By living vicariously through his exploits, they could feel powerful themselves.
Various historians have studied to understand how Luciano could have such a broad effect society and economics. How did he have a lasting impact that Capone did not? If Crockett was not connected to the Battle of the Alamo, how would he be remembered? How did one person become a name mentioned in passing, whilst another is a subject of serious study and fascination?
I would like to explore how someone like Luciano became a factor in people’s lives. Was he, the catalyst who changed organized crime and law enforcement? What was his archetypical role in crime, history, and culture? What was the difference between Luciano and the others? What is the power of archetypes in history? With a focus on the crime history of the U.S. during the 1920s and 1930s, I would compare and contrast Luciano with other colorful gangsters to understand why.
Works Used.
Cipollini, Christian, “Lucky Luciano: Mysterious Tales of a Gangland Legend.” 2014. Strategic Media: Rock Hill, SC. Print.
Minister, Christopher, “The Biography of Davy Crockett.” About.com. 2014. Web. http://latinamericanhistory.about.com/od/thehistoryofmexico/p/Biography-Of-Davy-Crockett.htm .
“Did Davy Crockett Die At the Alamo?” 2014. Web. http://latinamericanhistory.about.com/od/TexasIndependence/p/Did-Davy-Crockett-Die-In-Battle-At-The-Alamo.htm .
Tucker, Neely, “Eliot Ness and Al Capone, The Men, the Myths, and the Bad Man in the Dark.” The Washington Post. 18, February 2014. Web. http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/eliot-ness-and-al-capone-the-men-the-myths-and-the-bad-man-in-the-dark/2014/02/18/8223c47a-95aa-11e3-afce-3e7c922ef31e_story.html .
I became first aware of this phenomena with Davy Crockett. I had learned that he was probably taken prisoner of war after the Battle of the Alamo (1836), and later killed. Both the Alamo and Crockett loom large in people’s imaginations for different reasons. The Battle of the Alamo became a powerful story of martyrdom for Texas independence. Meanwhile Crocket was famous for his tales of his frontier exploits. Since the Disney series of the 1950s featured him dying during the battle, various people have objected to the notion of Crockett being a prisoner. However, there is confusion about where and when he died. Perhaps because of this murkiness, people refer that Crockett died a heroic death. His dying at the Alamo would number him amongst the Texan martyrs.
Then there is the story of how Eliot Ness brought Al Capone (Alphonse Capone) to justice. Because of “The Untouchables,” the memoir of Ness during his days as a U.S. Treasury Agent in Chicago, and later the TV program that featured his exploits, people believed that he had put the notorious gangster Capone in prison. However, it was the IRA agent Frank Wilson, and his special task force who brought the charges of income tax evasion against Capone in 1931. Few people realize that Capone was convicted for not paying his federal income taxes, and not for his other heinous crimes.
Did this epic story come from Ness igniting the public imagination with his colorful memoir? His writing makes for a compelling story of good overcoming evil. Since Capone seemed to be such a monster, and Ness so incorruptible and heroic, the two men became yoked together in a Christian morality play of good versus evil. Becoming larger than life, Ness and Capone morphed into equal and opposing forces locked in a titanic struggle.
Is there a nexus between notoriety and mystery that propels someone to be a legend? Consider the continual popularity of the infamous mobster, Lucky Luciano (Salvatore Lucania (1897-1962)). What makes him memorable while his contemporaries are relatively forgotten? Although Frank Costello (Francesco Castiglia), a friend of Luciano, became known as the “Prime Minister of the Mob,” few outside of crime history have heard of him. Meanwhile, popular culture made Luciano “Public Enemy Number One.” Stories about his scars, attempted murder, and gangster life abound. Often, these tales have been embellished around a small grain of truth. Many people viewed Luciano as the successful antihero, who thwarted authority. By living vicariously through his exploits, they could feel powerful themselves.
Various historians have studied to understand how Luciano could have such a broad effect society and economics. How did he have a lasting impact that Capone did not? If Crockett was not connected to the Battle of the Alamo, how would he be remembered? How did one person become a name mentioned in passing, whilst another is a subject of serious study and fascination?
I would like to explore how someone like Luciano became a factor in people’s lives. Was he, the catalyst who changed organized crime and law enforcement? What was his archetypical role in crime, history, and culture? What was the difference between Luciano and the others? What is the power of archetypes in history? With a focus on the crime history of the U.S. during the 1920s and 1930s, I would compare and contrast Luciano with other colorful gangsters to understand why.
Works Used.
Cipollini, Christian, “Lucky Luciano: Mysterious Tales of a Gangland Legend.” 2014. Strategic Media: Rock Hill, SC. Print.
Minister, Christopher, “The Biography of Davy Crockett.” About.com. 2014. Web. http://latinamericanhistory.about.com/od/thehistoryofmexico/p/Biography-Of-Davy-Crockett.htm .
“Did Davy Crockett Die At the Alamo?” 2014. Web. http://latinamericanhistory.about.com/od/TexasIndependence/p/Did-Davy-Crockett-Die-In-Battle-At-The-Alamo.htm .
Tucker, Neely, “Eliot Ness and Al Capone, The Men, the Myths, and the Bad Man in the Dark.” The Washington Post. 18, February 2014. Web. http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/eliot-ness-and-al-capone-the-men-the-myths-and-the-bad-man-in-the-dark/2014/02/18/8223c47a-95aa-11e3-afce-3e7c922ef31e_story.html .
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





